Does Probability Come from Quantum Physics?

Feb. 5, 2013 — Ever since Austrian scientist Erwin Schrodinger put his unfortunate cat in a box, his fellow physicists have been using something called quantum theory to explain and understand the nature of waves and particles.

But a new paper by physics professor Andreas Albrecht and graduate student Dan Phillips at the University of California, Davis, makes the case that these quantum fluctuations actually are responsible for the probability of all actions, with far-reaching implications for theories of the universe.

Quantum theory is a branch of theoretical physics that strives to understand and predict the properties and behavior of atoms and particles. Without it, we would not be able to build transistors and computers, for example. One aspect of the theory is that the precise properties of a particle are not determined until you observe them and “collapse the wave function” in physics parlance.

Schrodinger’s famous thought experiment extends this idea to our scale. A cat is trapped in a box with a vial of poison that is released when a radioactive atom randomly decays. You cannot tell if the cat is alive or dead without opening the box. Schrodinger argued that until you open the box and look inside, the cat is neither alive nor dead but in an indeterminate state.

For many people, that is a tough concept to accept. But Albrecht says that, as a theoretical physicist, he concluded some years ago that this is how probability works at all scales, although until recently, he did not see it as something with a crucial impact on research. That changed with a 2009 paper by Don Page at the University of Alberta, Canada.

“I realized that how we think about quantum fluctuations and probability affects how we think about our theories of the universe,” said Albrecht, a theoretical cosmologist.

One of the consequences of quantum fluctuations is that every collapsing wave function spits out different realities: one where the cat lives and one where it dies, for example. Reality as we experience it picks its way through this near-infinity of possible alternatives. Multiple universes could be embedded in a vast “multiverse” like so many pockets on a pool table.

There are basically two ways theorists have tried to approach the problem of adapting quantum physics to the “real world,” Albrecht said: You can accept it and the reality of many worlds or multiple universes, or you can assume that there is something wrong or missing from the theory.

Šrēdingera ‘kaķis’ ir neveiksmīga gadījuma procesu ilustrācija. Realitāte ir vienkārša: kamēr radioaktīvais atoms gamma kvantu nav izstarojis, šī notikuma varbūtību (sadalījuma blīvumu) apraksta Puasona vienādojums. Kad gamma kvants izstarots, procesu vairs neapraksta varbūtību sadalījums, Puasona v-s vairs neapraksta situāciju (saka, ka viļņu f-a esot ‘sabrukusi’), esam ieguvuši rezultātu, kura parādīšanās varbūtība gan atbilst Puasona v-am, bet – pagātnē. Kā visi gadījuma notikumi. Un nekādas spriedelēšanas un MWI.
Bet no Boba komentāra ir skaidrs viens fakts: kvantu nenoteiktība ir visas fizikālās pasaules gadījuma notikumu pamatā. Nenoteiktība   ir fundamentāla dabas īpašība.
Origin of probabilities and their application to the multiverse

(Submitted on 5 Dec 2012)
Abstract: We argue using simple models that all successful practical uses of probabilities originate in quantum fluctuations in the microscopic physical world around us, often propagated to macroscopic scales. Thus we claim there is no physically verified fully classical theory of probability. We comment on the general implications of this view, and specifically question the application of classical probability theory to cosmology in cases where key questions are known to have no quantum answer.

About basicrulesoflife

Year 1935. Interests: Contemporary society problems, quality of life, happiness, understanding and changing ourselves - everything based on scientific evidence.
This entry was posted in Common, Quantum Physics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Does Probability Come from Quantum Physics?

  1. Pingback: Why I Believe in the Many-Worlds Interpretation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s