Harvard Cognitive Scientist Shares Fascinating Insights About The Human Mind

Mar. 13, 2013, 11:42 AM | 2,813

Steve Pinker

The more we learn about the human mind, the more fascinating it becomes, according to Harvard cognitive scientist Steve Pinker. He’s known for his research in evolutionary psychology, or the idea that human nature has adapted over time to improve chances of survival.

 He’s written some bestselling books “How The Mind Works,” and “The Blank Slate,” and last night answered readers’ questions during a fascinating Reddit “Ask Me Anything”. We’ve included some of the highlights below:

On how language is the most fascinating thing about the human mind:

Here we all are, banging at keyboards and reading squiggles on screens, and somehow we’re exchanging ideas about consciousness, hunter-gatherer societies, rape, the meaning of life, and hair-care products. Of course we’re using written language, not to mention computer technology and the Internet, but we could be having the same conversation at a bar, dinner table or seminar room, so it’s language itself that is the astounding phenomenon.

On how understanding the mind affects happiness:

I find a naturalistic understanding of human nature to be indispensable to leading a wise and mature life, and it is often exhilarating. Wisdom consists in appreciating the preciousness and finiteness of our own existence, and therefore not squandering it; of being cognizant of what makes people everywhere tick, and therefore enhancing happiness and minimizing suffering; of being alert to limitations and flaws in our own judgments and decisions and passions, and thereby doing our best to circumvent them.

On if society will ever develop a better theory for consciousness:

As for the strange problem of consciousness — whether the red that I see is the same as the red that you see; whether there could be a “zombie” that is indistinguishable from you and me but not conscious of anything; whether an upload of the state of my brain to the cloud would feel anything — I suspect the answer is “never,” since these conundra may be artifacts of human intuition. Our best science tells us that subjectivity arises from certain kinds of information-processing in the brain, but why, intuitively, that should be the case is as puzzling to us as the paradoxes of quantum mechanics, relativity, and other problems that are far from everyday intuition.

Šis jautājums ir atbildēts: priešstats par sarkanu krāsu, ‘sarkanumu’, kuru mēs redzam, katram ir savs, individuāls tāpēc, ka šī ‘krāsas izjūta’ katram indivīdam veidojusies dzīves individuālās pieredzes laikā. Vienam izjūta ‘sarkans’ var būt saistīta ar ģimenes auto ugunīm, citam – ar asinīm, kas tek no brūces. Šādas pieredzes notikumu katram indivīdam ir tūkstošiem.

Pārējie jautājumi ir līdzīgi, atbildes uz tiem sniegtas manā rakstā ‘When will consciousness emerge?’ Publicēts http://www.journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/EEI/issue/view/89 Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Vol 2, No 1: March 2013. Raksts brīvi lasāms arī šajā lapā. 

On why AI will never match human intelligence:

We do have a decent understanding of consciousness in the sense of why an intelligent system might make available a pool of information to a variety of its modules while keeping other information encapsulated within those modules. The only sense of consciousness we don’t understand is whether the artificially intelligent computer or robot we build would subjectively feel anything — but that has nothing to do with how we built it. That’s why the problem is “strange.”

On atheism and why religion is a “puzzle in psychology”:

Atheism is simply the denial of one set of beliefs, and it has never been a priority to stipulate one among the many things I don’t believe in. The atheist/humanist/freethinker/secularist/bright movement found me (and I’m happy to support it) because I presented a thoroughly naturalistic, ghost-free account of the mind in How the Mind Works, including an analysis of religious belief as an interesting puzzle in psychology.

On the hypothesis that depression is an adaptation:

I don’t know the literature well enough to say, but it’s not implausible that occasional, mild, temporary depression in response to an identifiable setback is an adaptation — the main reason being the phenomenon of depressive realism, namely the more accurate assessment of outcomes and probabilities among the (mildly, temporarily) depressed than among happy people. Clinical depression is another story.

Es domāju, ka apziņā pastāv daudzi līdzsvari, kuros sabalansēti pozitīvo un negatīvo saišu signāli. Cilvēku pasaules uztvere veidojas kā līdzsvari starp kritisku apkārtējās pasaules (tajā ietilpst arī ‘es’) uztveri un smadzeņu veidotiem saudzējošiem mehānismiem, kas šos kritiskos redzējumus izskaistina ar izjūtām ‘cik es esmu liels, gudrs, veiksmīgs, u.t.t. Šo līdzsvaru vidējās vērtības katram indivīdam savas, tādēļ mēs novērojam tik atšķirīgus cilvēkus (no skaļi plātīgiem līdz ļoti klusiem un pieticīgiem). 

Depresija nav adaptācija, bet sarežģītas automāiskās regulēšanas sistēmas ‘iekrišana’ vienā no daudziem iespējamiem lokāliem kritiskajiem punktiem – gala stāvokļiem, kas veidojas daudzu pozitīvo un negatīvo saišu darbības rezultātā: veģetatīvā sistēma saņem signālus (negatīvu, depresīvu notikumu scenārijus) no korteksa un limbiskajām smadzenēm, un šie signāli savukārt pastiprina veģetatīvās sistēmas novirzes. I.V. 

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/steve-pinker-reddit-ask-me-anything-2013-3#ixzz2NySQlvuy

About basicrulesoflife

Year 1935. Interests: Contemporary society problems, quality of life, happiness, understanding and changing ourselves - everything based on scientific evidence. Artificial Intelligence Foundation Latvia, http://www.artificialintelligence.lv Editor.
This entry was posted in All Posts, Human Evolution. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s